At a panel I moderated last week at the C&EN Media Group Marketing Elements Summit 2025, I asked 50 sales and marketing pros whether they agreed with the statement: “In my company, sales and marketing target the same audience, and leads are followed up quickly.”
Only a few hands went up.
That gap isn’t just a process issue. It’s an energy drain. Silos and the “blame the leads” game create a demotivating culture. Shared goals, shared KPIs, and shared language create momentum, better buying journeys, and revenue. The unifier: a clear North Star and transparency.
If the gap is real, what does “good” look like in the wild? We framed the panel, and this post around three practical questions:
The panel agreed with the feedback from the LinkedIn polls.
Silos with no shared plan (76%), followed by blame for low-quality leads (20%), and “most MQLs rejected” (4%). Two spot-on comments: without standard definitions there is no alignment; and MQL rejection is the visible smoke that reveals hidden silos.
So what? Make the hidden visible.
Start here: Publish a one-page dictionary, a simple follow-up agreement, and a monthly report of stage-to-stage conversion and MQL rejection reasons.
Voters chose total qualified pipeline (40%), lead-to-customer (33%), closed-won revenue (27%)—and one comment nailed it: pipeline progression wins for both mature and scaling teams.
So what? Volume isn’t unity, progression is.
Start here: Make the North Star Qualified Pipeline Progression in ICP accounts and show weekly stage movement by ICP segment.
Those findings tell us what to measure; purpose and trust determine how we work together to move real accounts.
The polls tell us where to look; purpose and trust tell us how to act. If we reward vanity numbers, we’ll chase them. In life sciences, where buying is consensus-driven and risk-sensitive, transactional tactics stall.
Shared purpose reframes the work:
Before: “Hit 200 MQLs.” → After: “Help the right accounts (think ICP) make confident decisions.”
Trust changes the conversation:
Before: “Book a demo?” → After: “What risk are you managing right now, and what evidence would make this a safe move?”
Aligned teams don’t ask for more dashboards, they ask for clarity (who we’re for), consistency (how we pursue), and confidence (we do this together). When teams lead with purpose and speak like humans, the right metrics follow.
Here’s the minimal set of habits that change outcomes, even in small teams.
What: One shared view of language, follow-up, and movement.
How: Publish a one-page dictionary (ICP, MQA, MQL, SQL, SAL, Opportunity, Disqualifiers), a written follow-up SLA, and a single dashboard with territory + account views, stage movement, and MQL rejection rate. Transparency turns the blame game into a learning loop.
What: Qualified Pipeline Progression in ICP accounts. Progression forces the team to ask: “Are the right accounts actually moving?” It aligns SDRs, AEs, marketers, and CS around the same movie, not different snapshots.
How: Report movement weekly by ICP segment. Retire any KPI that doesn’t predict revenue.
What: Build it together so it gets used.
How:
What: Rituals beat rules; recognition cements habits.
How: 20-minute weekly huddle on the same dashboard; bi-weekly no-blame retro. Celebrate fast, helpful follow-up and good-faith disqualification as loudly as wins.
With your buyer: In life sciences, decisions live in a web of scientists, procurement, QA/RA, and legal. Read the culture of the account: who moves first, who needs air-cover, who decides by evidence vs. precedent, and then adapt your play.
What: Curiosity earns the second meeting.
How: Use prompts like: “What are you under pressure to solve this quarter?” “If you did nothing for six months, what breaks?” “What evidence would make this safe for your team?”
These questions anchor to purpose and risk reduction, the two currencies that matter in complex B2B buying.
Intent |
Action |
---|---|
Week 1 | Language + Purpose
|
Week 2 | Co-create plays
|
Week 3 | Visibility
|
Week 4 | Learning
|
Week 5 | Culture
|
Companies where sales and marketing are highly aligned have 19% faster growth and 15% more profitability.
B2B organizations that unify commercial strategies and leverage multithreaded commercial engagements will realize revenue growth that outperforms their competition by 50%.
Transparency turns friction into learning. Make language, follow-up, and outcomes public.
Chase one North Star: qualified pipeline progression in ICP accounts, then use lead-to-customer and revenue as health checks. ABM wins when it’s co-created. If both teams didn’t build it, it won’t be used.
Culture > process. Rituals and recognition make alignment stick.
Trust over transactions. Real human conversations reduce risk for buyers, and for your team.
It’s your turn now, run an “alignment check”. Score your team across 10 behaviors (e.g. language, agreements, progression, huddles) and get a prioritized fix list you can action next week. Want to check-in with me before running your alignment check, please send me an email at jasmine@strivenn.com.
Yah, I went a little bit acronym crazy on this post. Here’s a glossary of terms:
Term |
Definition |
---|---|
ABM | Account-Based Marketing: Account-first strategy where sales and marketing co-create plays for named accounts. |
AE | Account Executive: The salesperson who owns deals for target accounts. |
AI | Artificial Intelligence: Used to jump-start building conversation kits and other assets. |
B2B | Business-to-Business: The buying context you’re addressing (complex, multi-stakeholder). |
C&EN | Chemical & Engineering News: The media brand hosting the Marketing Elements Summit you referenced. |
CS | Customer Success: Post-sale team focused on onboarding, value realization, and expansion. |
ICP | Ideal Customer Profile: The shared definition of the types of accounts you’re targeting. |
KPI | Key Performance Indicator: The shared measures both teams track on the dashboard. |
MQA | Marketing-Qualified Account: A named account that meets agreed engagement/fit signals. |
MQL | Marketing-Qualified Lead: An individual lead that meets the marketing criteria for follow-up. |
No blame retro | A short, scheduled review where sales + marketing look at the last sprint/campaign to learn and improve, without finger-pointing. The goal is to turn “who messed up?” into “what will we change next week?” Blame the process, not the person. Bring one metric and one example, not a story. Decide on what to keep, kill and try with an owner and due date. |
SAL | Sales-Accepted Lead: An MQL that sales has accepted for pursuit under agreed criteria. |
SDR | Sales Development Representative: Prospecting role handling first touches and meeting setting. |
SQL | Sales-Qualified Lead: A lead/opportunity that sales has qualified as pipeline-worthy. |
QA/RA | Quality Assurance / Regulatory Affairs: Buyer stakeholders common in life-science deals. |